Accessibility Minutes 2013 03 25
From MemberWiki
Present
- Jon Gunderson (University of Illinois)
- Marc Johlic (IBM)
- Mike Scott ((Illinois Department of Human Services)
- Nicholas Hoyt (University of Illinois) - scribe
Minutes
MS: Where does the AInspector Sidebar fit into the suite of tools?
NH: More of a general purpose tool that provides a rules orientation to evaluation results.
MJ: Likes the colored boxes with summary statistics.
MJ: Would like a breakdown within each WCAG Guideline by Success Criterion.
JG: Please send any comments regarding wording of rule summary, definition and/or result message text to OAA list.
MJ: Would like to see the note about A* below the Rule Results table.
MS: I like the term "Red Flag Rule": could possibly use a red flag icon next to the A designation.
JG: Will send out a new survey re. Red Flag/Basic rules that will allow users to rank the rules.
JG: Each ruleset may designate which rules are "Basic Rules".
MS: Should red flag rules be machine testable?
NH: I see the main purpose of the basic/red flag rules for screening.
MS: Important to define the context of voting for red flag rules: these are for the testing tools.
JG: Moving on to the agenda items for rules development.
JG: Link to documentation: /member/wiki/Version_2.0_Layout_Rules
JG: Layout rules: have three rules already defined in the library.
JG: Rule 3: role=presentation would be required in ARIA Strict and recommended in ARIA Transitional
JG: Rule 1: meaningful sequence mainly requires manual checking
JG: Rule 2: nested layout tables will produce violation
MS: Rule 2 is sort of an extra that we may not need.
JG: Looks like we can take Rule 2 out of our current rulesets.
JG: Rule 1 is a required rule
JG: I added an FAE 1.1 ruleset
JG: In the FAE 1.1 ruleset, the rules that duplicate existing rules in FAE 1.1 will be required, and the other rules we have added since FAE 1.1 will be recommended.