[OpenAjaxMobile] [OpenAjaxSecurity] Proposed conceptual framework for Mobile Device API security

Paddy Byers paddy.byers at gmail.com
Thu Mar 27 11:19:12 PDT 2008


I'm flying later today so I suspect you'll get there first :)

Paddy

On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Jon Ferraiolo <jferrai at us.ibm.com> wrote:

> Hi Paddy,
> As we discussed at the beginning of today's phone call (minutes coming
> soon!), this all makes sense to me. I'll merge your HTML page content into
> the security page later today unless I notice that you beat me to it.
>
> Jon
>
>
> [image: Inactive hide details for "Paddy Byers" <paddy.byers at gmail.com>]"Paddy
> Byers" <paddy.byers at gmail.com>
>
>
>
>     *"Paddy Byers" <paddy.byers at gmail.com>*
>             Sent by: mobile-bounces at openajax.org
>
>             03/27/2008 08:53 AM
>             Please respond to
>             OpenAjax Alliance discussion list on Mobile Ajax <
>             mobile at openajax.org>
>
>
> To
>
> mobile at openajax.org
> cc
>
>
> Subject
>
> Re: [OpenAjaxMobile] [OpenAjaxSecurity] Proposed conceptual framework for
> Mobile Device API security
>
> Hi,
>
>    *
>    http://www.openajax.org/member/wiki/Mobile_Device_APIs_Security#Proposed_conceptual_framework_for_Mobile_Device_API_security
>    *<http://www.openajax.org/member/wiki/Mobile_Device_APIs_Security#Proposed_conceptual_framework_for_Mobile_Device_API_security>
>
>    I'm not sure how much my write-up matches what we talked about last
>    week. If the IBM engineers feel that I either made mistakes in capturing
>    what we talked about, or if they disagree with any of my additions, please
>    speak up. And of course everyone else should review the ideas and say what
>    you think.
>
>    Basically, I propose that one of the things that we should do at
>    OpenAjax is work on a white paper that talks about security considerations
>    with having the Web Runtime access device APIs.
>
>
>
> I think this is good progress.
>
> I've written some notes to follow from this, to discuss some issues that
> relate to the objectives you've set out. The first installment of these is
> attached - again, this is embryonic but hopefully you can see where I'm
> heading.
>
> Another thing I could suggest at this point is that I describe our
> existing (WebVM) framework using this terminology as a concrete example.
>
> Paddy
> *(See attached file: security_discussion.mdwn)**(See attached file:
> security_discussion.html)*_______________________________________________
> mobile mailing list
> mobile at openajax.org
> http://openajax.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mobile mailing list
> mobile at openajax.org
> http://openajax.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://openajax.org/pipermail/mobile/attachments/20080327/7f05cbc8/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 105 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://openajax.org/pipermail/mobile/attachments/20080327/7f05cbc8/attachment-0002.gif 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 45 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://openajax.org/pipermail/mobile/attachments/20080327/7f05cbc8/attachment-0003.gif 


More information about the mobile mailing list