[OpenAjaxIDE] [OpenAjaxGadgets] Widget constructors - property bag *not* passed
Jon Ferraiolo
jferrai at us.ibm.com
Thu Aug 14 10:53:10 PDT 2008
Hi Howard,
So we can hammer through this issue, are you available for the IDE phone
call next Tuesday (1pm PT) or a Gadgets phone call next Wednesday (also 1pm
PT)?
Stew is out this week, but I assume he will be available next week.
Thanks.
Jon
"Howard Weingram"
<weingram at tibco.c
om> To
Jon Ferraiolo/Menlo Park/IBM at IBMUS,
08/13/2008 05:06 <ide at openajax.org>,
PM <gadgets at openajax.org>
cc
Subject
RE: [OpenAjaxGadgets] Widget
constructors - property bag *not*
passed
I am not sure about this, Jon.
The property bag being passed in could include properties
(such as local security callbacks) that are not intended for
external advertisement.
Could we please leave this in here for now? Thanks.
hw
From: gadgets-bounces at openajax.org [mailto:gadgets-bounces at openajax.org]
On Behalf Of Jon Ferraiolo
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 1:07 PM
To: ide at openajax.org; gadgets at openajax.org
Subject: [OpenAjaxGadgets] Widget constructors - property bag *not*
passed]
As we worked on the reference implementation, we discovered that there was
no need to pass a property bag to the widget constructor, as we have
talked about in the past. The widget can simply call
widgetwrapper.getPropertyValue() for any property values that it needs,
and can make the call to getPropertyValue() at the time when the widget
needs the information. Another approach to getting property values is to
take advantage of the @@foo@@ macro substitution feature by including
something like <javascript>var backgroundcolor='@@bgcolor@@';</javascript>
In our reference implementation, we maintain copies of property values on
both sides (i.e., one copy in the mashup editor and one copy in the widget
itself), so when a widget calls getPropertyValue(), there is negligible
performance impact. It seems likely that other implementations would use a
similar approach.
Does anyone see any problems with removing the preliminary section in the
spec (i.e., still has red-colored comments) that talks about passing the
property bag to the widget constructor? To me, this is a vestigial section
that no longer makes sense. Here is the section of the spec that I propose
to remove:
*
http://www.openajax.org/member/wiki/OpenAjax_Metadata_Specification_Widget_Metadata#Widget_properties_and_widget_constructor_arguments
If no one objects by the end of the week, I'll remove this section.
Jon
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://openajax.org/pipermail/ide/attachments/20080814/154bba70/attachment.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: graycol.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 105 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://openajax.org/pipermail/ide/attachments/20080814/154bba70/attachment.gif
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: pic04910.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 1255 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://openajax.org/pipermail/ide/attachments/20080814/154bba70/attachment-0001.gif
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ecblank.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 45 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://openajax.org/pipermail/ide/attachments/20080814/154bba70/attachment-0002.gif
More information about the IDE
mailing list